<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Web Consultancy UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com</link>
	<description>All things Emarketing!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s the big deal about Google&#8217;s search plus your world? by Andrew Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/social-networking/whats-the-big-deal-about-googles-search-plus-your-world/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=316#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s not bad at all Dan.  Google+ has lots of functionality that Facebook doesn&#039;t have and I&#039;d recommend setting yourself up with a profile and giving it a whirl.  The problem Google+ has is that it is yet to gain critical mass. 50 mln might sound like a lot of users, but compared to Facebook&#039;s 500 mln it&#039;s a drop in the ocean.  That said, the 50 Mln are early adoptor types who tend to lead trends, rather that follow them, so expect to see numbers significantly increase in 2012.

My gripe isn&#039;t with Google+, just the way Google have promoted it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s not bad at all Dan.  Google+ has lots of functionality that Facebook doesn&#8217;t have and I&#8217;d recommend setting yourself up with a profile and giving it a whirl.  The problem Google+ has is that it is yet to gain critical mass. 50 mln might sound like a lot of users, but compared to Facebook&#8217;s 500 mln it&#8217;s a drop in the ocean.  That said, the 50 Mln are early adoptor types who tend to lead trends, rather that follow them, so expect to see numbers significantly increase in 2012.</p>
<p>My gripe isn&#8217;t with Google+, just the way Google have promoted it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s the big deal about Google&#8217;s search plus your world? by Dan Bostock</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/social-networking/whats-the-big-deal-about-googles-search-plus-your-world/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bostock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=316#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Interesting article I take google plus is no good then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article I take google plus is no good then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s the big deal about Google&#8217;s search plus your world? by Alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/social-networking/whats-the-big-deal-about-googles-search-plus-your-world/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=316#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more - summed up very well. Google in its current form offers me information, advice, research, et al. and even the slightest change will steer me away.....laters google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; summed up very well. Google in its current form offers me information, advice, research, et al. and even the slightest change will steer me away&#8230;..laters google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can big agencies &#8216;do&#8217; digital? by Andrew Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/techtalk/can-big-agencies-do-digital/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=221#comment-49</guid>
		<description>You know me Yann. I have no issues with paying good people (whether they be creative or technical) fair wages. It just erks me when so much of what gets paid goes into the pockets of middle men and people at the top. This is why something like Motion Collective sounds really exciting. By going straight to the source for technical and creative skills you&#039;re getting quality and value; a winning combination. I&#039;ll be very interested in seeing how this progresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know me Yann. I have no issues with paying good people (whether they be creative or technical) fair wages. It just erks me when so much of what gets paid goes into the pockets of middle men and people at the top. This is why something like Motion Collective sounds really exciting. By going straight to the source for technical and creative skills you&#8217;re getting quality and value; a winning combination. I&#8217;ll be very interested in seeing how this progresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can big agencies &#8216;do&#8217; digital? by Yann</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/techtalk/can-big-agencies-do-digital/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Yann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=221#comment-47</guid>
		<description>It always seems to end up as a dig at agencies for being over priced on production with you my friend ;)

..but it&#039;s the same story for most industries which bring together creative &amp; technical under one roof.
 
Provided the culture is right and the organization is efficient, you are paying for the unlikely marriage between, procedural, technical - do-ers and  lateral, creative - thinkers. They should work side by side, share knowledge, debate, and push the boundaries of feasibility, all in an effort to generate measurable value, build on brand values and engage the end-user.

- that&#039;s why you pay a premium.

If  you think you&#039;re not getting value then I would argue you haven&#039;t been working with the right team of people.

..so there!


This is not the first time this criticism of agency culture has come up.. so a team of us have decided to do something about it and are setting up: 

Motion Collective

www.motioncollective.co.uk

basically, we are a union of independent sole-traders, both experienced creative and producer types,  working together to offer clients &amp; agencies with digital communications, in particular one of the most expensive agency out-cost; video production and motion-graphics.

Same creative and technical types as you&#039;d find in award winning agencies, expect;

- we choose to work together (rather then be selected via HR..)
- no expensive postcode to work from
- no share-holders
- no sales dept  
- no expensive Xmas party (only downfall.. )




Still setting up, so comments appreciated :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always seems to end up as a dig at agencies for being over priced on production with you my friend <img src='http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/demilo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>..but it&#8217;s the same story for most industries which bring together creative &amp; technical under one roof.</p>
<p>Provided the culture is right and the organization is efficient, you are paying for the unlikely marriage between, procedural, technical &#8211; do-ers and  lateral, creative &#8211; thinkers. They should work side by side, share knowledge, debate, and push the boundaries of feasibility, all in an effort to generate measurable value, build on brand values and engage the end-user.</p>
<p>- that&#8217;s why you pay a premium.</p>
<p>If  you think you&#8217;re not getting value then I would argue you haven&#8217;t been working with the right team of people.</p>
<p>..so there!</p>
<p>This is not the first time this criticism of agency culture has come up.. so a team of us have decided to do something about it and are setting up: </p>
<p>Motion Collective</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motioncollective.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.motioncollective.co.uk</a></p>
<p>basically, we are a union of independent sole-traders, both experienced creative and producer types,  working together to offer clients &amp; agencies with digital communications, in particular one of the most expensive agency out-cost; video production and motion-graphics.</p>
<p>Same creative and technical types as you&#8217;d find in award winning agencies, expect;</p>
<p>- we choose to work together (rather then be selected via HR..)<br />
- no expensive postcode to work from<br />
- no share-holders<br />
- no sales dept<br />
- no expensive Xmas party (only downfall.. )</p>
<p>Still setting up, so comments appreciated <img src='http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/demilo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social wars &#8211; Google plus Vs Facebook by Chris Rodbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/social-networking/social-wars-google-plus-vs-facebook/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rodbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=131#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Incisive discussion Andrew - interesting read!

My bet is long term plus will win out... (but that&#039;s looooong)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incisive discussion Andrew &#8211; interesting read!</p>
<p>My bet is long term plus will win out&#8230; (but that&#8217;s looooong)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you love your brand, set it free by Andrew Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/google/if-you-love-your-brand-set-it-free/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=216#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Happy to help Adam - I&#039;ve done a fair bit of research into what makes a website trustworthy.  

Certainly in the case of ecommerce sites there are multiple aspects involved.  Brand is obviously a significant factor.  Brands are built on trust.  In fact, many would say that that trust is the defining feature of a brand.  So a recognised brand sitting behind your website will be a strong catalyst for sales.  Even if you don&#039;t have a strong brand yourself, you can still piggyback on others.  Visa and MasterCard provide trustmarks that can be used on your site.  In the case of BateauxLondon.com we used the Enjoy England logo on every page to engender trust.  Awards and industry body logos can be used in the same way.

Another strong aspect of building trust that most people don&#039;t recognise (at least on a conscious level) is design.  A well designed site that pays heed to the customer journey builds trust.  Bad syntax, spelling and poorly thought out font use also acts as a warning sign to consumers, so be sure to employ an educated copy writer.

I use extended Verisign class 3 verification on all my sites.  This costs a little bit more to implement (£1000 per site) but is worth it as a visible trust guarantee (it appears as a green padlock in the url bar of Explorer 8).

Finally, and without giving away all my secrets, checkout visibility is essential.  The checkout process should be well mapped out, with the journey easily navigated through the use of a breadcrumb trail.  At any point in the checkout journey the customer should be able to review their details/purchases, and amend them.  Simples.

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to help Adam &#8211; I&#8217;ve done a fair bit of research into what makes a website trustworthy.  </p>
<p>Certainly in the case of ecommerce sites there are multiple aspects involved.  Brand is obviously a significant factor.  Brands are built on trust.  In fact, many would say that that trust is the defining feature of a brand.  So a recognised brand sitting behind your website will be a strong catalyst for sales.  Even if you don&#8217;t have a strong brand yourself, you can still piggyback on others.  Visa and MasterCard provide trustmarks that can be used on your site.  In the case of BateauxLondon.com we used the Enjoy England logo on every page to engender trust.  Awards and industry body logos can be used in the same way.</p>
<p>Another strong aspect of building trust that most people don&#8217;t recognise (at least on a conscious level) is design.  A well designed site that pays heed to the customer journey builds trust.  Bad syntax, spelling and poorly thought out font use also acts as a warning sign to consumers, so be sure to employ an educated copy writer.</p>
<p>I use extended Verisign class 3 verification on all my sites.  This costs a little bit more to implement (£1000 per site) but is worth it as a visible trust guarantee (it appears as a green padlock in the url bar of Explorer 8).</p>
<p>Finally, and without giving away all my secrets, checkout visibility is essential.  The checkout process should be well mapped out, with the journey easily navigated through the use of a breadcrumb trail.  At any point in the checkout journey the customer should be able to review their details/purchases, and amend them.  Simples.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google drop&#8217;s their wallet by Adam Diamantides</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/google/google-drops-their-wallet/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Diamantides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=116#comment-40</guid>
		<description>The UK needs to catch up with tech in many ways.  e.g. Running a web design business in the small town of Totnes with 8meg max speed broadband is a bit frustrating at times to say the least.  South Korea are miles ahead with the net  . . . but then they do have clinics for internet addicts too ;-/  

NFC... ?   . . . well it might be ready whet they fix the railways. Ha ha! I have to say I still like the look of that phone though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK needs to catch up with tech in many ways.  e.g. Running a web design business in the small town of Totnes with 8meg max speed broadband is a bit frustrating at times to say the least.  South Korea are miles ahead with the net  . . . but then they do have clinics for internet addicts too ;-/  </p>
<p>NFC&#8230; ?   . . . well it might be ready whet they fix the railways. Ha ha! I have to say I still like the look of that phone though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you love your brand, set it free by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/google/if-you-love-your-brand-set-it-free/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=216#comment-39</guid>
		<description>How to build trust on the internet is an interesting topic! Google are certainly conecting with people with their doodles. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on what makes a wesite trustworthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to build trust on the internet is an interesting topic! Google are certainly conecting with people with their doodles. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on what makes a wesite trustworthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you love your brand, set it free by Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/online/google/if-you-love-your-brand-set-it-free/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultancy.uk.com/?p=216#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Googles doodles always teach me something new and keep me coming back for more just to see what going on that day. A whole new take on the old school of thought on branding I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googles doodles always teach me something new and keep me coming back for more just to see what going on that day. A whole new take on the old school of thought on branding I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

